Education Policy, From the Chalk Face, School-wide Literacy
Comments 20

Looking Past the Masks

It’s easy to mistake symptoms for causes.

I have been thinking recently about how reading problems become more and more disguised as children get older. Instead of seeing a reading problem, we see all sorts of other problems.


At first, Richard is excited to be attending Tree Tops School. He is looking forward to learning about maths and science, and he enjoys stories. He is a bit slow to pick up reading in the way many others are, so the teacher talks to his mother about making sure he reads the books at home that he struggled with during the school day. Mum does her best, but with three other children it’s not easy to help Richard, who is already trying to avoid books as they cause him frustration. Besides, if the teacher can’t sort it, she reasons, how can I? At this stage, Richard’s reading problem is acknowledged, but it is not seen as urgent; he will read when he is ready.

After a couple of years, Richard’s problems are more pronounced and much more obvious. He has decided that reading is not for him. He doesn’t take reading activities seriously, is restless and sometimes disruptive, and won’t go near a book at home. He is disengaged from most academic learning, even in science and maths. Mum has asked the school for extra help but they say that Richard is just not developmentally ready and it will all come together in a year or so. Reading is still acknowledged as an issue, but it has been overshadowed by a developmental explanation.


In a year so it has not all come together, at least not in the way the school predicted. The developmental explanation has failed. Richard is now struggling in lots of areas because he can’t keep up with the work. He is clearly at the lower end of the class in nearly every subject, and his motivation is low across the range of subjects. His mother asks for help again and the school says that they will have him assessed.

An assessment is carried out and concludes that Richard is a little below average intelligence and that he may have a specific learning difficulty. His restlessness and fidgeting mean that ADHD is a possible reason for his learning difficulties. Further testing is recommended, but the school is out of funding, and time, and so he goes into the next year. Because of the compounding effects of reading failure, his problem is now seen as a cognitive one. Various deficits within Richard are now being offered as the explanation for why he is struggling. No one questions the teaching.


By the time he reaches secondary school Richard is labelled as SEN, with moderate learning difficulties and emotional / mental health needs including possible ADHD. The SENDCO allocates him to a literacy intervention and the teacher explains to Richard that he has dyslexia, dyspraxia, and a hyperactivity disorder. This means that Richard is always going to have difficulty with learning but that the school will give him every support to cope with his education.

Richard now has a number of clear messages:

  • The problems he has had with reading and other schoolwork are caused by something that is wrong with him.
  • There is nothing anyone can do to fix what is wrong with him.
  • There is no hope of real success: his time at school is now to be endured rather than enjoyed.

At this stage of his education, Richard is one of those students who seem to take up a lot of teacher time with very little result. There are after-school detentions for poor behaviour, catch-up detentions for missed homework, long talks with his form tutor about taking school more seriously, phone calls home to his weary mother. Richard’s behaviour, low motivation and low scores in specific subjects are the areas of greatest concern. No one would deny he is a poor reader, but then he has SEN, so this is to be expected.


By the time Richard leaves school, he has joined the ranks of 17% of the school population with a clutch of sub-C GCSEs (DfE 2015 citing PISA, 2012), a patchy behaviour record and a highly developed set of skills for masking the fact that he can’t read or write at a functional level. How will he cope now?

According to the National Literacy Trust, there are over six million adults in the UK who are functionally illiterate. If we had six million people with any other problem it would be regarded as a massive epidemic. But we are so well-trained to conceal illiteracy, to dismiss it, to ascribe it to various syndromes, disorders and social problems, that this epidemic rages in silence around us. And when someone does raise a voice to say there’s a problem, there is a great deal of frowning and tut-tutting, because this shows that the person is not ‘kind’ and they do not ‘understand about disabilities’.


‘Kindness’ in the sense of well-meaning sympathy is a key reason for this epidemic. Richard, no doubt, received a great deal of sympathy throughout his unhappy education. Unfortunately, this didn’t do him any good, because what he needed was practical help: a teaching approach that would break down what he needed to know and ensure that he learned it, even if this took time and considerable effort. Instead, the focus was on home circumstances, development, specific learning difficulties, behaviour, motivation – none of which changed his situation.

We become distracted by these issues, which effectively mask the real problem. Our students will wear the masks we give them, because they are children, and incredibly susceptible to the narratives we create for them. Tell a boy he is naughty, and he will wear that mask. Tell a girl she is so sweet, but that she has a learning condition, and she will wear that mask.  We don’t even have to tell them – we signal our expectations in all kinds of subtle ways, from the behaviours we tolerate as “his ADHD”  to surprise when a student does well.


I’m not suggesting that poor reading is the only problem students face, or that it’s the only one that schools need to worry about. I am suggesting it is the single most powerful issue that schools can address, with the biggest return for the investment of time and money it would take to fix. Obviously, best scenario is to get it right in the early years, but even in later secondary, it can still be fixed.


So instead of teaching Richard and his peers a dozen ways to mask the problem, how about we cast aside the camouflage, roll our sleeves up, teach reading explicitly, systematically and ambitiously, and solve the real problem?

You may also be interested in:

No Excuses Left

Addicted to Denial?

The Natural Home for Reading Interventions

Te Wero – The Challenge

Code-Teaching or Code-Breaking?



  1. And here is something else that is at the root of the problem – when children are identified as slower to learn than others, and they do get provided with some intervention, is the intervention truly informed by research and leading-edge practice? It is highly likely that it is not. I’m addressing this state of affairs, and culpability for it, via my Phonics Intervention blog, see this post for example:

    Isn’t it a mess – even here in England where some leading politicians have endeavoured to promote evidence-informed beginning reading instruction. The trouble is, the whole teaching profession (not just infant teachers) needs training in reading instruction to get a good understanding of the complex English alphabetic code and how best to teach, and support, learners with reading and spelling – even beyond infants. I suggest those in authority need to go the further mile and hold to account all the organisations who are still not in line with the research and perpetuate misinformation.


    • I long for more of those in authority to start taking responsibility. We’re talking about children’s lives. Sorting out this mess is an ultra marathon!


  2. I’ve added your post to the International Foundation for Effective Reading Instruction forum here:

    Please rest assured, our focus is very much on drawing attention to these issues and working hard to hold people to account. I have been contacted by several people since starting the blog on the Phonics Intervention site – they are literally providing me with specific evidence to help draw attention to the flawed guidance, training material and intervention provision that is so commonplace.


  3. Pingback: Thinkreadtweet's post is a MUST read: 'Looking Past the Masks' - Phonics Intervention

  4. Pingback: Does phonics help or hinder comprehension? | thinkingreadingwritings

  5. Pingback: It’s Not Too Late | thinkingreadingwritings

  6. Pingback: Struggling readers in the secondary English classroom | thinkingreadingwritings

  7. Pingback: Are grammar schools the best way to address social mobility? | thinkingreadingwritings

  8. Pingback: Seven ways to increase a student’s chances of exclusion | thinkingreadingwritings

  9. Pingback: Insights from Direct Instruction: Part 2 – TomNeedham

  10. Pingback: Calling secondary English teachers – work with us to make a real difference! | thinkingreadingwritings

  11. Pingback: Can reading problems affect mental health? | thinkingreadingwritings

  12. Pingback: Barriers to Success – The Bridge Over the Reading Gap revisited (Part 6) | thinkingreadingwritings

  13. Pingback: A question of expectations | thinkingreadingwritings

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.